Standards Frame
Use standards as the audit vocabulary, not as a blanket claim.
| Framework | Why reviewers ask | Expected response |
|---|---|---|
| ISO/IEC 27001 | Whether governance, risk, policy, access, supplier, and secure-SDLC evidence exists. | Provide product evidence plus organizational and deployment evidence for the audited scope. |
| NIST CSF 2.0 | Whether outcomes across govern, identify, protect, detect, respond, and recover are evidenced. | Map the binder sections to those outcomes without claiming formal certification. |
| FIPS 140-3 | Whether the audited deployment uses validated cryptographic modules and can prove the crypto boundary. | Attach deployment-specific TLS, Vault, KMS, HSM, and module evidence. |
| PCI DSS | Whether the deployment keeps payment data out of scope or can evidence the required guardrails. | Use PCI-sensitive caveats, tenant policy evidence, and data-minimization boundaries. |
Report Catalog
Prepare a scoped binder instead of one generic product statement.
Evidence Rules
Every binder must identify the exact audited scope.
- Record the audited deployment, tenant or customer scope, report date, product version, component image refs, and commit SHAs.
- Use immutable release refs for production evidence.
- Redact secrets while preserving parameter names, non-default status, rotation timing, and owner.
- Link every open caveat to the owning work item instead of hiding it.
Next Step
Use the live public surface as the review artifact.
When a customer or reviewer needs product-safe wording, point them at these URLs on veridataops.com and then attach deployment-specific evidence separately.